Adam BlansettSenior Full-Stack & AI Engineer
Senior Engineering Discipline

Technical Consulting & Advisory

Senior technical judgment to derisk decisions, assess codebases, and guide execution.

I partner with founders, executives, and engineering leaders to provide unbiased technical clarity. Drawing on experience leading and mentoring teams of 4 to 30+ engineers and achieving ~95% automated test coverage in regulated industries, I help teams build durable engineering practices.

The Business & Architectural Problem It Solves

Making the wrong technology choices, hiring the wrong vendor, or misjudging project scope can cost months of runway and hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Key Deliverables & System Capabilities

Concrete engineering outputs, architectures, and automated deliverables produced during an engagement.

Engineering team leadership advisory, code review standards, and developer mentoring (teams of 4–30+)
Automated testing architecture and coverage uplift (proven ~95% automated test coverage practices)
Technical due diligence and feasibility assessments for new product initiatives
Hiring advisement and technical interviewing for senior engineering roles
Regulatory and security alignment reviews (healthcare data handling, banking security, GDPR)

What You Can Bring to Me

Common architectural inflection points and codebase challenges where this service provides immediate clarity.

Scenario 01

Founders or executive teams seeking experienced technical judgment to vet software scopes, vendors, or architecture roadmaps.

Scenario 02

Establishing engineering quality standards, code review protocols, and automated test coverage (targeting ~95% coverage).

Scenario 03

Assessing technical feasibility and architecture options before deploying significant engineering capital.

Target Audience & Ideal Fit

Founders without a technical co-founder, product managers leading complex software projects, or investors assessing technical viability.

Available Engagement Models

  • Monthly Advisory Retainer
  • Project-Based Technical Assessment
  • Ad-Hoc Consultation Calls

Core Technologies & Infrastructure

Due DiligenceCode ReviewsTesting Strategy (Jest/PHPUnit)Security & ComplianceTeam Mentorship

Frequently Asked Questions

Clear, practical answers regarding engagement structure, timelines, code ownership, and working models.

What engagement models are available for technical advisory?+

Options range from fixed-scope packages (like the 48-Hour Codebase Audit) to fractional lead retainer advisory (weekly architectural guidance, vendor reviews, and team mentoring).

How does the 48-Hour Codebase Audit work?+

Within 48 business hours of repository access, I conduct an intensive inspection of architecture, security, database queries, and test coverage, delivering a prioritized report and a 45-minute live technical debrief call.

Can you help evaluate candidate hires or vendor proposals?+

Yes. I frequently advise founders and executives on vetting technical vendor proposals, assessing agency deliverables, and conducting technical interviews for senior engineering hires.